Table 2 The global design of prehabilitation programmes for patients with colorectal cancer
Hospitals that provide prehabilitation (n = 46) | Hospitals that are interested in the implementation of prehabilitation (n = 20) | |
|---|---|---|
N (%) | N (%) | |
Do you/would you triage patients before start of a prehabilitation programme? | ||
Yes | 37 (80.4%) | 18 (90.0%) |
No | 9 (19.6%) | 2 (10.0%) |
What (sub-)groups (would) qualify for prehabilitation?a | ||
All patients with CRC | 8 (17.4%) | 7 (35.0%) |
Frail patients with CRC | 33 (71.7%) | 13 (65.0%) |
Elder patients with CRC | 19 (41.3%) | 9 (45.0%) |
High-risk patients with CRC | 26 (56.5%) | 11 (55.0%) |
Patients with diseases other than CRC | 9 (19.6%) | 8 (40.0%) |
What domains are/would be included in the hospital’s prehabilitation programme for CRC?b | ||
Nutritional status | 45 (97.8%) | 20 (100%) |
Frailty | 39 (84.8%) | 16 (80.0%) |
Physical status | 39 (84.8%) | 18 (90.0%) |
Mental status | 22 (47.8%) | 15 (75.0%) |
Intoxications | 27 (58.7%) | 15 (75.0%) |
Anaemia | 38 (82.6%) | 20 (100%) |
Polypharmacy | 19 (41.3%) | 14 (70.0%) |
Other | 1 (2.2%) | 1 (5.0%) |
What is/would be the design of the interventions?a | ||
Advices for home | 28 (60.9%) | 9 (45.0%) |
A structured, standardised programme equal for all patients | 6 (13.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
A structured, individualised tailored programme | 34 (73.9%) | 20 (100%) |
Other | 11 (23.9%) | 0 (0.0%) |
In what setting is/would the programme being/be offered?a | ||
Hospital based | 24 (52.2%) | 6 (30.0%) |
In primary care facilities | 39 (84.8%) | 19 (95.0%) |
In the gym | 14 (30.4%) | 6 (30.0%) |
Home based | 32 (69.6%) | 16 (80.0%) |