Skip to main content

Table 2 Receiver-operating characteristic analysis and cut-off thresholds for RFM ultrasound measurements for predicting frailty (CFS > 4)

From: Preoperative rectus femoris muscle ultrasound, its relationship with frailty scores, and the ability to predict recovery after cardiac surgery: a prospective cohort study

 

Cut-off

Sensitivity

(95% CI)

Specificity

(95% CI)

Positive Likelihood Ratio

(95% CI)

Negative Likelihood Ratio

(95% CI)

AUROC

(95% CI)

Muscle thickness; cm

 Mean of dominant and non-dominant legs

 ≤ 1.400

90.9

(58.7–99.8)

50.0

(38.1–61.9)

1.82

(1.35–2.44)

0.18

(0.03–1.19)

0.75

(0.64–0.84)

 Mean (normalised by BMI)

 ≤ 0.046

54.6

(23.4–83.3)

78.4

(67.3–87.1)

2.52

(1.26–5.04)

0.58

(0.30–1.12)

0.64

(0.53–0.74)

 Mean (normalised by BSA)

 ≤ 0.880

100.0

(71.5–100.0)

28.4

(18.5–40.1)

1.40

(1.21–1.61)

0.00

0.66

(0.55–0.76)

Muscle cross-sectional area; cm2

 Mean of dominant and non-dominant legs

 ≤ 3.015

63.6

(30.8–89.1)

93.2

(84.9–97.8)

9.42

(3.62–24.53)

0.39

(0.18–0.85)

0.76

(0.66–0.85)

 Mean (normalised by BMI)

 ≤ 0.190

90.9

(58.7–99.8)

52.7

(40.7–64.4)

1.92

(1.42–2.61)

0.17

(0.03–1.13)

0.74

(0.63–0.83)

 Mean (normalised by BSA)

 ≤ 2.056

63.6

(30.8–89.1)

87.8

(78.2–94.3)

5.23

(2.45–11.17)

0.41

(0.19–0.91)

0.75

(0.64–0.83)

Muscle echogenicity; au

 Mean of dominant and non-dominant legs

 > 45.85

54.6

(23.4–83.3)

75.7

(64.3–84.9)

2.24

(1.14–4.39)

0.60

(0.31–1.16)

0.61

(0.50–0.72)

  1. Au Arbitrary units, AUROC Area under receiver-operating characteristic curve, BMI Body mass index, BSA Body surface area, CFS Clinical Frailty Scale, RFM Rectus femoris muscle