Skip to main content

Table 4 Reported recommendations

From: A scoping review of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS), protocol implementation, and its impact on surgical outcomes and healthcare systems in Africa

Recommendations

Number of articles

Further research (Hsieh and Shannon 2005; Fathy et al. 2023; Loots et al. 2023; Plenge et al. 2023; Elsabbagh et al. 2023; Ferghali et al. 2023; Ahmed et al. 2023; Elgamal et al. 2023)

8

To implement the protocol (Peters et al. 2023b; Loots et al. 2023; Baluku et al. 2023; Elsabbagh et al. 2023; Ferghali et al. 2023)

5

Protocol be adopted as a standard of care (Oodit et al. 2021; Ammar et al. 2023; Plenge et al. 2023; Ahmed et al. 2023)

4

Education and training (Ammar et al. 2023; Abdelrazik and Sanad 2023)

2

Continuous evaluation (Ammar et al. 2023; Abdelrazik and Sanad 2023)

2

To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis (Plenge et al. 2023; Elsabbagh et al. 2023)

2

Team collaboration (Abdelrazik and Sanad 2023)

1

ERAS is feasible and effective in a LMICs (Hsieh and Shannon 2005)

1

ERAS could be implemented for other forms of surgery in South Africa and across the African context (Hsieh and Shannon 2005)

1

Recognition of perioperative care as a sub-specialty (Oodit et al. 2021)

1

Specialty-specific tailored protocol (Plenge et al. 2023)

1