Skip to main content

Table 1 Study information

From: A systematic review and meta-analysis of thoracic epidural analgesia versus other analgesic techniques in patients post-oesophagectomy

Author and Year

Country

Design

Randomisation

Allocation concealment

Source of funding

Number

Surgical approach

Flisberg et al. 2001

Sweden

RCT

NR

NR

University and Society of Medicine grants

33

Open

Yokoyama et al. 2005

Japan

RCT

NR

NR

NR

30

Open

Fares et al. 2014

Egypt

RCT

Computer generated

Opaque envelopes

None

30

Open

Wang et al. 2017

China

RCT

Random number table

NR

NR

80

Open

Wang et al. 2019

China

RCT

Computer generated

Opaque envelopes

Innovation and Science Foundation grants

40

Open

Liu and Wang 2015

China

RCT

NR

NR

NR

60

Open

Li 2019

China

RCT

Computer generated

Opaque envelopes

Science Foundation and educational grants

100

Open

Zhu et al. 2020

China

RCT

Computer generated

NR

NR

120

Open

Maghsoudloo et al. 2023

Iran

RCT

Based on odd/even surgical date

NR

NR

80

Open

Xu et al. 2023

China

RCT

Computer generated

Opaque envelopes

Cancer, Science Foundation and research grants

168

Laparoscopic

  1. RCT randomised controlled trial, NR not reported