Skip to main content

Table 1 Certainty of evidence according to the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) scale

From: Antibiotic prophylaxis in emergency cholecystectomy for mild to moderate acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Certainty assessment

№ of patients

Effect

Certainty

Importance

№ of studies

Study design

Risk of bias

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Imprecision

Other considerations

[Antibiotics]

[Placebo]

Relative

(95% CI)

Absolute

(95% CI)

Total postoperative infectious complications

 7

Randomized trials

Seriousa

Not serious

Not serious

Not seriousb

None

78/866 (9.0%)

95/881 (10.8%)

RR 0.84

(0.63 to 1.12)

17 fewer per 1000

(from 40 fewer to 13 more)

Moderate

CRITICAL

Total surgical site infections

 6

Randomized trials

Seriousa

Not serious

Not serious

Not seriousb

None

2/651 (0.3%)

8/655 (1.2%)

RR 0.79

(0.56 to 1.12)

3 fewer per 1000

(from 5 fewer to 1 more)

Moderate

CRITICAL

Total distant infections

 5

Randomized trials

Seriousa

Not serious

Not serious

Not seriousb

None

21/820 (2.6%)

20/837 (2.4%)

RR 1.01

(0.55 to 1.88)

0 fewer per 1000

(from 11 fewer to 21 more)

Moderate

CRITICAL

Total postoperative non-infectious complications

 6

Randomized trials

Seriousa

Not serious

Not serious

Not seriousb

None

78/824 (9.5%)

94/833 (11.3%)

RR 0.84

(0.64 to 1.11)

18 fewer per 1000

(from 41 fewer to 12 more)

Moderate

IMPORTANT

Mortality

 5

Randomized trials

Seriousa

Not serious

Not serious

Very seriousd

None

0/699 (0.0%)

2/711 (0.3%)

RR 0.34

(0.04 to 3.23)

2 fewer per 1000

(from 3 fewer to 6 more)

Very low

CRITICAL

Readmission

 5

Randomized trials

Seriousa

Not serious

Not serious

Seriousc

None

28/731 (3.8%)

41/742 (5.5%)

RR 0.69

(0.43 to 1.11)

17 fewer per 1000

(from 31 fewer to 6 more)

Low

IMPORTANT

Length of hospital stay

 5

Randomized trials

Seriousa

Seriouse

Not serious

Not serious

None

617

626

-

MD 0.89 Day higher

(0.14 lower to 1.92 higher)

Low

IMPORTANT

  1. Abbreviations: CI confidence interval, MD mean difference, RR risk ratio
  2. aSome of the included studies have a high risk of bias
  3. bThe optimal information size criterion is met, and the 95% CI overlaps no effect (i.e., CI includes RR of 1.0), but CI excludes important benefits and harm
  4. cThe optimal information size criterion is met, the 95% CI overlaps no effect (i.e., CI includes RR of 1.0), and the CI fails to exclude important benefits
  5. dThe optimal information size criterion is met, the 95% CI overlaps no effect (i.e., CI includes RR of 1.0), and the CI fails to exclude important benefits and harm
  6. eThere was a significant heterogeneity (I2 = 98%)