Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 3 Secondary outcomes during the study period

From: Comparison of erector spinae plane block and transverse abdominis plane block in postoperative recovery after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

 

ESPB group (n = 30)

TAPB group (n = 30)

p-value

PACU duration, min

65.8 ± 7.3

68.3 ± 10.6

0.293

Cumulative sufentanil consumption, μg

 0–24 h

62 (61–65)

66 (63–70)

 < 0.001

 24–48 h

61 (60–61.2)

61 (60–62)

0.46

 Time to ambulation, days

4 (3–4)

4 (3–5)

0.056

 Hospital stay, days

7 (6–9)

8 (7–10)

0.037

 Patient satisfaction score

9 (8 ~ 9)

8 (7–9)

0.001

 Time to first flatus, h

41 (32.8–48)

43.5 (34.8–56.3)

0.2

 Required rescue analgesic, n (%)

3 (10)

5 (16.7)

0.706

 PONV, n (%)

9 (30)

5 (16.7)

0.222

 Comprehensive Complication Index

0 (0–8.7)

8.7 (0–14.4)

0.216

 Reported block complications

0

0

0.99

  1. Dates are reported as mean ± SD, median (IQR), or number (percentage) where appropriate
  2. PONV Postoperative nausea and vomiting, ESPB Erector spinae plane block, TAPB Transverse abdominis plane block, PACU Postanesthesia care unit