Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 4 Baseline characteristics of 114 patients included in the study after matching

From: Effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on lung cancer surgery outcomes: a matched-case analysis

Characteristic

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) (n = 57)

Non-intervention or control (NG) (n = 57)

Patient demographics

 Age

70.48 (7.25)

71.80 (7.36)

 Gender (male)

32 (56.7%)

35 (61.7%)

Smoking status

 Pack years

32.67 (23.58)

30.82 (24.63)

Lung function

 %DLCO

71.38 (18.70)

73.19 (19.13)

 PpoDLCO

57.22 (15.41)

57.76 (14.40)

Surgical incision

 Open

35 (60%)

33 (56.7%)

 VATS

22 (40%)

24 (43.3%)

Surgery side

 Right

16 (30%)

14 (26.7%)

Lung resection

 Wedge

10 (17.5%)

12 (21.1%)

 Segmentectomy

2 (3.5%)

4 (7%)

 Lobectomy

41 (71.9%)

37 (64.9%)

 Bilobectomy

3 (5.3%)

4 (7%)

 Sleeve

0

0

 Pneumonectomy

1 (1.8%)

0

Comorbidity

 COPD

25 (45%)

19 (34.2%)

Other measures

 MRC dyspnoea score > 2

3 (5.3%)

3 (5.3%)

  1. Data are presented as mean (median), standard deviation (interquartile range), or numbers and percentages for categorical data
  2. DLCO diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, PpoDLCO predicted postoperative DLCO, VATS video-assisted thoracic surgery, COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease